Thanks for the link Sandy
Sandy wrote: "Its seems they will be employing a Controlled Radiation Pattern Antenna (CRPA) set up. Which nulls sectors on the antenna nullifying the jamming signal to allow the relative weak (compared to the jamming signal) GPS signal through."
The military anti-jamming GPS kit I have experience of uses directional antennas that can be pointed directly at the satellites, reducing the receiver's sensitivity to jammers. However, these antennas are too expensive for most commercial applications, so GINCAN, as you say, could be a real breakthrough.
Sandy wrote: "I cannot personally think of reason why I would need anti-jamming capabilities when out walking, biking etc."The reason I believe the likes of GINCAN are important for us when we are out in the great outdoors, is that if we are using our handheld satnavs to navigate we will usually be unaware if they are being spoofed (
giving a false reported location) or jammed, rendering them useless, and the occurrence of jamming and spoofing is rapidly increasing, plus some folk -
read a lot - rely solely on the handheld satnavs Sandy
Back in 2011 a government funded study, called Sentinel, identified on one stretch of motorway over 60 separate incidents of jamming were detected over a 6 month period, and it is estimated that there are now thousands of ‘personal’ jammers in use.
Because the GNSS signals originating from the satellites are so weak, so called ‘personal’ jammers can affect a large area.
In 2010 an engineering firm worker in New Jersey had a GPS jammer in his truck so his bosses don't know where he was all the time. However, his route took him close to Newark Airport and his 'personal' jammer interfered with the airport's landing system, leading to disruptions and an investigation spanning several months.
Plus of course there is legitimate jamming & spoofing and again, unless somebody has read this thread
Satnav (GPS) Jamming Notices they will most likely be unaware of it.